Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115983›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Event-Related Potentials to Facial Expressions Are Related to Stimulus-Level Perceived Arousal and Valence.

Amie J Durston, Roxane J Itier

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amie J DurstonDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-6012
Roxane J ItierDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6460-5218

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 418431Wellcome Trust 213322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial expressions provide critical details about social partners' inner states. We investigated whether event-related potentials (ERP) related to the visual processing of facial expressions are modulated by participants' perceived arousal and valence at the stimulus level. ERPs were recorded while participants (N = 80) categorized the gender of faces expressing fear, anger, happiness, and no emotion. Participants then viewed each face again and rated them on arousal and valence using 1-9 Likert scales. For each participant, ratings of each unique face were linked back to corresponding ERP trials. ERPs were analyzed at all time points and electrodes using hierarchical mass univariate statistics. Three different ANOVA models were employed: the original emotion model, and models with valence or arousal ratings as trial-level regressors. Results from models with ratings highly overlapped with the original model, although they were more temporally restricted. The N170 component was the most impacted by arousal and valence ratings, with four out of six emotion contrasts revealing significant valence or arousal interactions. Emotion effects on the P2 component were mostly unrelated to ratings. On the EPN component, only two contrasts related to both arousal and valence ratings. Thus, ERP emotion effects are related to participants' perceived arousal and valence of the stimuli, although this association depends on the contrast analyzed. These findings, their limitations, and generalizability are discussed in reference to existing theories and literature.

Indexed as

ArousalEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFacial ExpressionFacial RecognitionAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adultarousalevent‐related potentialsfacial expressionsmass univariate analysesvalence

Identifiers

PMID40115983
PMCPMC11926668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.