ReviewAnimal cells and systems2025
Comparative epigenomics to clinical trials in human breast cancer and canine mammary tumor.
Review in Animal cells and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updated guide to RNA quantification by RNA sequencing and reverse transcription-qPCR.Molecules and cells · 2026Article
- The role of epigenetic alterations in canine mammary cancer.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- RepID promotes metastatic potential in osteosarcoma through regulation of the PRC1-GATA6 axis.Animal cells and systems · 2026Article
- Sumoylation of cyclin and its therapeutic potential for cancer.Animal cells and systems · 2026Review
- The RNA revolution in medicine: from gene regulation to clinical therapeutics.Animal cells and systems · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epigenetics and epigenomics are captivating fields of molecular biology, dedicated to the exploration of heritable alterations in gene expression and cellular phenotypes, which transpire devoid of any discernible modifications to the fundamental DNA sequence. This intricate regulatory apparatus encompasses multiple mechanisms, prominently featuring DNA methylation, histone modifications, and the involvement of non-coding RNA molecules in pivotal roles. To achieve a comprehensive grasp of these diverse mechanisms, it is imperative to conduct research employing animal models as proxies for human studies. Since experimental animal models like mice and rats struggle to replicate the diverse environmental conditions experienced by humans, this review focuses on comparing common epigenetic alterations in naturally occurring tumors in canine models, which share the human environment, with those in humans. Through this, we emphasize the importance of an epigenetic regulation in the comparative medical approach to a deeper understanding of cancers and further development of cancer treatments. Additionally, we elucidate epigenetic modifications pertinent to specific developmental stages, the ageing process, and the progression of various diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.