ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Automatic optimization of regions of interest in hyperspectral images for detecting vegetative indices in soybeans.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetative indices (VIs) are widely used in high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) for the assessment of plant growth conditions; however, a range of VIs among diverse soybeans is still an unexplored research area. For this reason, we investigated a range of four major VIs: normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), photochemical reflectance index (PRI), anthocyanin reflectance index (ARI), and change to carotenoid reflectance index (CRI) in diverse soybean accessions. Furthermore, we ensured the correct positioning of the region of interest (ROI) on the soybean leaf and clarified the effect of choosing different ROI sizes. We also developed a Python algorithm for ROI selection and automatic VIs calculation. According to our results, each VI showed diverse ranges (NDVI: 0.60-0.84, PRI: -0.03 to 0.05, ARI: -0.84 to 0.85, CRI: 2.78-9.78) in two different growth stages. The size of pixels in ROI selection did not show any significant difference. In contrast, the shaded part and the petiole part had significant differences compared with the non-shaded and tip, side, and center of the leaf, respectively. In the case of the Python algorithm, algorithm-derived VIs showed a high correlation with the ENVI software-derived value: NDVI -0.97, PRI -0.96, ARI -0.98, and CRI -0.99. Moreover, the average error was detected to be less than 2.5% in all these VIs than in ENVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.