ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Clinical and molecular characteristics of periampullary carcinoma based on pathological subtypes.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periampullary carcinoma (PAC) is a relatively rare but highly aggressive malignancy, posing challenges to the determination of the optimal therapeutic approach. The objective of this study was to clarify the potential of histopathological typing in guiding chemotherapy selection for patients with advanced PAC and to characterize the distinct molecular features, underlying functional changes, and regulatory mechanisms associated with the different subtypes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients with advanced PAC admitted to the Oncology Department of Xijing Hospital between January 2015 and May 2022. These patients received first-line chemotherapy with either FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) or gemcitabine-based regimens. Certain patients were divided into the pathological typing group and the control group. The pathological typing group received subtype-specific chemotherapy regimens, while the control group received chemotherapy regimens based on the primary tumor site. We compared the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Using publicly available databases (GSE60980), we conducted differential gene screening, enrichment analysis, and immune cell infiltration assessment. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed based on the differentially expressed genes, resulting in the identification of 60 node genes. Subsequently, a core gene selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression machine learning algorithm was performed to identify the key genes specific to PAC-PB subtype. Results: The pathological typing group consisted of 46 patients, with 26 classified as the PB subtype and 20 as the IN subtype, while the control group comprised 40 patients. Compared to those in the control group, patients in the pathological typing group demonstrated significant improvements in overall response rate (20.5% Conclusions: Pathologic typing-guided individualized chemotherapy resulted in prolonged survival for patients with advanced PAC. The PB and IN subtypes of PAC exhibit distinct molecular regulatory mechanisms and immune infiltration microenvironments. These findings underscore the importance of considering subtype-specific factors in the development of a PAC-PB diagnostic model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.