ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
The prognostic impact of body mass index on patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic and Predictive Significance of Body Mass Index in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase enforces p21 degradation via dePARylation to promote gastric cancer progression.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Body mass index (BMI) is considered a negative prognostic factor in gastric cancer (GC), but its impact on different types of pathology remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between BMI and clinicopathology and its impact on the prognosis of GC, particularly between adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma subtypes. Methods: This study analyzed 3,081 GC patients who received extensive GC surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between April 2008 and December 2019. Demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, and survival data were reviewed from the medical records of all patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis detected independent risk factors affecting prognosis in GC patients. Furthermore, the correlation between BMI and clinicopathological factors was analyzed using Chi-squared assays. Effects of BMI on overall survival in patients with different pathologic types of GC were determined using the Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age (P<0.001), BMI (P<0.001), surgery (P<0.001), differentiation (P=0.03), pathological type (P<0.001), nerve invasion (P=0.01), maximum tumor diameter (P=0.05), pathologic tumor (pT) stage (P<0.001), pathologic node (pN) stage (P<0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P<0.001), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) (P<0.001) were prognostic factors for GC. Patients were divided into three groups based on BMI (kg/m Conclusions: BMI has a reference value for the prognosis of GC. Patients with a higher BMI had a significantly better prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma. In mucinous adenocarcinoma, the prognosis of patients in the three BMI groups did not differ significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.