Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115866›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2025

Level and determinants of advanced life support knowledge among nurses in Spain: A national cross-sectional study.

Rosa Pérez-Ibáñez, Isabel Almodóvar-Fernández, Pasqual Gregori Roig, Paula Sánchez-Thevenet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosa Pérez-IbáñezSchool of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Health Outcomes Research Group (Grupo de Investigación en Resultados de Salud), Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Isabel Almodóvar-FernándezPredepartmental Nursing Unit, Quality of Life, Sports and Health Research Group, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0580-664X
Pasqual Gregori RoigDepartment of Paediatrics and Neonatology, La Plana University Hospital, Villarreal, Spain.
Paula Sánchez-ThevenetSchool of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Health Outcomes Research Group (Grupo de Investigación en Resultados de Salud), Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7018-6128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study are to assess the knowledge of advanced life support among general nurses in Spain, identify knowledge gaps and analyze the demographic, educational, and occupational determinants of their level of knowledge. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2020 to February 2021 among general nurses in Spain. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on demographics, educational, and professional background, as well as theoretical knowledge questions. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the influencing factors associated with the outcome of the educational measure. Results: A total of 888 general nurses participated in the study, with representation from all 52 Spanish provinces; 80% of whom were female nurses. The 72.3% of the nurses did not attain the 70% correct score on the theoretical questionnaire, a prerequisite for achieving an adequate pass rating. The study revealed inadequate knowledge among the participating nurses with regard to the characteristics of fluid therapy, the conditions for defibrillation and the action algorithm in the event of a defibrillate rhythm, and the recommendations for use of the LUCAS RCP Conclusions: The study shows that Spanish general nurses have insufficient knowledge of advanced life support and that there are evident knowledge gaps in key subject areas relating to best practices for cardiorespiratory arrests. This indicates that they require knowledge building to promote evidence-based patient care. Furthermore, the findings emphasize the significance of ongoing education needed to respond to high-risk events such as a cardiac arrest. The positive and negative factors identified in this study, which influence the attainment of a good level of advanced life support knowledge, should be taken into account.

Indexed as

Advanced life supportcontinuing education in nursingknowledgeresuscitation

Identifiers

PMID40115866
PMCPMC11924098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.