Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115854›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2025

Video-assisted submuscular breast reconstruction: evaluating a novel technique in high-risk patients.

Leonardo Barellini, Simone Miccoli, Benedetta Daicampi, Pietro Susini, Ishith Seth, Mirco Pozzi, Roberto Cuomo, Luca Grimaldi, Gianluca Marcaccini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leonardo BarelliniBreast Surgery Unit, Livorno Hospital, Livorno, Italy.
Simone MiccoliBreast Surgery Unit, Livorno Hospital, Livorno, Italy.
Benedetta DaicampiBreast Surgery Unit, Livorno Hospital, Livorno, Italy.
Pietro SusiniPlastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Ishith SethMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mirco PozziPlastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Roberto CuomoPlastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Luca GrimaldiPlastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Gianluca MarcacciniPlastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent oncological diseases worldwide, with mastectomy often necessary for treatment. Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is essential for restoring physical integrity and improving patients' quality of life, especially in high-risk individuals with advanced age, obesity, diabetes, smoking habits, or a history of radiotherapy. Traditional submuscular reconstruction techniques are effective but often associated with higher rates of complications in this patient population. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel video-assisted procedure (VAP) for submuscular breast reconstruction, focusing on its ability to reduce complications and enhance outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis compared 17 high-risk patients who underwent VAP with 127 patients treated using traditional non-video-assisted procedures (NVAP) between September 2022 and June 2024. Both groups were comparable in age, body mass index (BMI), and risk factors. Data on postoperative complications, including bleeding, wound dehiscence, and infections, were collected and analyzed. Statistical significance was determined using appropriate tests, with a P value <0.05 considered significant. Results: The VAP group demonstrated significant reductions in complications compared to the NVAP group. No cases of postoperative bleeding were reported in the VAP group, while 8.66% of NVAP patients experienced bleeding. Wound dehiscence rates were also lower in the VAP group (5.88%) compared to the NVAP group (10.24%). The minimally invasive nature of VAP allowed for precise dissection and reduced tissue trauma without prolonging surgical times. Conclusions: The findings suggest that VAP is a safer and more effective alternative for high-risk patients requiring submuscular breast reconstruction. By minimizing complications and enhancing both functional and aesthetic outcomes, VAP offers a promising innovation in reconstructive surgery. Larger, randomized trials are necessary to validate these results and establish VAP as a standard of care in diverse clinical settings.

Indexed as

high-risk patient surgeryminimally invasive surgerypost-mastectomy techniquessubmuscular breast reconstructionVideo-assisted breast reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID40115854
PMCPMC11921365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.