Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115760›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of experimental medicine2025

Bile acid therapy for primary biliary cholangitis: Pathogenetic validation.

Vasiliy I Reshetnyak, Igor V Maev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vasiliy I ReshetnyakDepartment of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, Russian University of Medicine, Moscow 127473, Russia. vasiliy.reshetnyak@yandex.ru.
Igor V MaevDepartment of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, Russian University of Medicine, Moscow 127473, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the etiological and pathogenetic mechanisms of the development of any disease is essential for its treatment. Because the cause of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), a chronic, slowly progressive cholestatic liver disease, is still unknown, treatment remains symptomatic. Knowledge of the physicochemical properties of various bile acids and the adaptive responses of cholangiocytes and hepatocytes to them has provided an important basis for the development of relatively effective drugs based on hydrophilic bile acids that can potentially slow the progression of the disease. Advances in the use of hydrophilic bile acids for the treatment of PBC are also associated with the discovery of pathogenetic mechanisms of the development of cholangiocyte damage and the appearance of the first signs of this disease. For 35 years, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been the unique drug of choice for the treatment of patients with PBC. In recent years, the list of hydrophilic bile acids used to treat cholestatic liver diseases, including PBC, has expanded. In addition to UDCA, the use of obeticholic acid, tauroursodeoxycholic acid and norursodeoxycholic acid as drugs is discussed. The pathogenetic rationale for treatment of PBC with various bile acid drugs is discussed in this review. Emphasis is made on the mechanisms explaining the beneficial therapeutic effects and potential of each of the bile acid as a drug, based on the understanding of the pathogenesis of the initial stages of PBC.

Indexed as

Norursodeoxycholic acidObeticholic acidPrimary biliary cholangitisTauroursodeoxycholic acidTreatment of primary biliary cholangitis with bile acidsUrsodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID40115760
PMCPMC11718588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.