Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115674›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Noninvasive Diagnostic Approach for Identifying Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) in Young Women: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Michael S Nasr, Marc Haber, Samer R Nasr

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael S NasrDepartment of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LBN.
Marc HaberDepartment of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LBN.
Samer R NasrDepartment of Cardiology, Mount Lebanon Hospital, Hazmiyeh, LBN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 19-year-old female patient presented with an acute onset of substernal chest pain, accompanied by dyspnea and diaphoresis while walking to the gym. She was able to start her routine, but the pain worsened. She was taken to the emergency room, where an electrocardiogram was performed, and no irregularities were observed, while the troponin test was significantly elevated. Imaging studies, including a Doppler echocardiogram and an emergent CT of the chest to rule out aortic dissection, returned normal results. The pain subsided after two hours, but troponin kept increasing; consequently, spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) was suspected. In view of the young age of the patient, it was decided to refrain from performing a coronary angiogram, intravascular ultrasound, or optical coherence tomography. A CT coronary angiography scan did not show any anomaly. A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed a clear subendocardial enhancement indicative of a myocardial infarction. A diagnosis of SCAD was confirmed, and no further testing was done. The patient was started on aspirin and beta-blockers, and advised to perform only minimal to moderate exercise and to consult a healthcare physician immediately if the episode recurs. CT angiogram ruled out fibrodysplasia of the renal arteries, and plasma metanephrines were normal. This case shows that with the advancement of noninvasive techniques, there is probably no need for invasive measures to diagnose SCAD in stable patients.

Indexed as

case studydiagnosisepidemiologynoninvasive cardiologyshort reviewsspontaneous coronary artery dissectiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID40115674
PMCPMC11923495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.