ArticleCureus2025
A Noninvasive Diagnostic Approach for Identifying Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) in Young Women: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Decision-Making and Imaging-Guided Follow-Up Strategies in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Shifting Paradigms in SCAD Care: Favoring OMT Over Intervention - Lessons from a National Cohort.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Unveiled: Pathophysiology, Imaging, and Evolving Management Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 19-year-old female patient presented with an acute onset of substernal chest pain, accompanied by dyspnea and diaphoresis while walking to the gym. She was able to start her routine, but the pain worsened. She was taken to the emergency room, where an electrocardiogram was performed, and no irregularities were observed, while the troponin test was significantly elevated. Imaging studies, including a Doppler echocardiogram and an emergent CT of the chest to rule out aortic dissection, returned normal results. The pain subsided after two hours, but troponin kept increasing; consequently, spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) was suspected. In view of the young age of the patient, it was decided to refrain from performing a coronary angiogram, intravascular ultrasound, or optical coherence tomography. A CT coronary angiography scan did not show any anomaly. A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed a clear subendocardial enhancement indicative of a myocardial infarction. A diagnosis of SCAD was confirmed, and no further testing was done. The patient was started on aspirin and beta-blockers, and advised to perform only minimal to moderate exercise and to consult a healthcare physician immediately if the episode recurs. CT angiogram ruled out fibrodysplasia of the renal arteries, and plasma metanephrines were normal. This case shows that with the advancement of noninvasive techniques, there is probably no need for invasive measures to diagnose SCAD in stable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.