Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115663›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2024

Understanding public response: Government communication during the COVID-19 crisis through the eyes of the Swiss public.

Nicola Diviani, Maddalena Fiordelli, Sara Rubinelli

Abstract readAddress
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicola DivianiSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Maddalena FiordelliFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Sara RubinelliSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the Swiss public perception of COVID-19 communication by the government and its impact on behavior and trust. Methods: A cross-sectional representative online survey was conducted in January 2022 in a sample of 2587 Swiss residents. Results: Overall the survey showed moderate satisfaction with communication, with relevance rated highly. Perceptions of communication varied across demographics. Also, differences were noted in trust in institutions, risk perception, and attitudes towards public health measures based on perceived communication quality. Conclusion: This study highlights the dynamic nature of public health communication and underscores the significance of continuous adaptation and evaluation of strategies to effectively reach and influence diverse audiences. As misinformation persists, the study underscores the need for informative, empathetic, and honest communication, as well as tailored approaches to build public trust-an essential asset for managing health crises successfully. Innovation: This study provides innovative concrete insights into how governmental communication could be designed more strategically to effectively communicate with the public in contexts characterized by disinformation, emphasizing the role of quality, honest, and empathetic communication in public health messaging.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19DisinformationGovernmentSurvey

Identifiers

PMID40115663
PMCPMC11923423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.