ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2025
Evolution of Therapy in Autoimmune Hepatitis.
Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fibrosis-4 and Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio Index as Predictors of Relapse in Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Preexisting Liver Disease and Pregnancy: Optimizing Care to Optimize Outcomes.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated liver disease characterized by a spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from asymptomatic liver enzyme abnormalities to fulminant liver failure. Despite significant achievements, the backbone of first-line AIH treatment, including corticosteroids and azathioprine, has remained nearly unchanged for 5 decades. However, up to 20% of patients experience insufficient response, loss of response, or treatment intolerance. For patients intolerant to first-line therapy, second-line options include mercaptopurine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with recent debates regarding MMF's potential role in first-line treatment. A significant advancement has been the tailoring of azathioprine doses and manipulating blood levels with the addition of low-dose allopurinol by using therapeutic metabolite monitoring for patients with insufficient or lost biochemical response. Increasing experience with calcineurin inhibitors and biologic agents, particularly rituximab and infliximab, has demonstrated their efficacy as third-line options. Notably, B-cell activating factor blockade emerges as a promising future treatment. This article delves into the chronological evolution of AIH treatment, focusing on recent advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40115657PMC11920018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.