Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115612›Full record

ArticleJournal of physics. Conference series2024

All-in-SAM: from Weak Annotation to Pixel-wise Nuclei Segmentation with Prompt-based Finetuning.

Can Cui, Ruining Deng, Quan Liu, Tianyuan Yao, Shunxing Bao, Lucas W Remedios, Bennett A Landman, Yucheng Tang, Yuankai Huo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physics. Conference series, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. HATs: Hierarchical Adaptive Taxonomy Segmentation for Panoramic Pathology Image Analysis.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. FNPC-SAM: Uncertainty-Guided False Negative/Positive Control for SAM on Noisy Medical Images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Can CuiComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Ruining DengComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Quan LiuComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Tianyuan YaoComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Shunxing BaoElectrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Lucas W RemediosComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Bennett A LandmanElectrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Yucheng TangNVIDIA Cooperation, Redmond, WA, USA.
Yuankai HuoComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
AI-empowered 3D Computer Vision and Image-Omics Integration for Digital Kidney HistopathologyR01DK135597 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Yuankai Huo · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Segment Anything Model (SAM) is a recently proposed prompt-based segmentation model in a generic zero-shot segmentation approach. With the zero-shot segmentation capacity, SAM achieved impressive flexibility and precision on various segmentation tasks. However, the current pipeline requires manual prompts during the inference stage, which is still resource intensive for biomedical image segmentation. In this paper, instead of using prompts during the inference stage, we introduce a pipeline that utilizes the SAM, called all-in-SAM, through the entire AI development workflow (from annotation generation to model finetuning) without requiring manual prompts during the inference stage. Specifically, SAM is first employed to generate pixel-level annotations from weak prompts (e.g., points, bounding box). Then, the pixel-level annotations are used to finetune the SAM segmentation model rather than training from scratch. Our experimental results reveal two key findings: 1) the proposed pipeline surpasses the state-of-the-art methods in a nuclei segmentation task on the public Monuseg dataset, and 2) the utilization of weak and few annotations for SAM finetuning achieves competitive performance compared to using strong pixelwise annotated data.

Identifiers

PMID40115612
PMCPMC11925546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.