ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Evaluating the causes associated with false positive Galactomannan assay in suspected cases of respiratory fungal infections.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fungal Infections in Pediatric Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Transplantation: Impact on the Upper and Lower Respiratory Systems.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The circulating GM antigen is considered an important and reliable biomarker according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) guidelines. However several possible causes of false-positive reactions have been reported, including intake of certain antibiotics, cross-reactivity with other fungi (e.g. Histoplasma capsulatum, Alternaria spp., Candida spp, and Fusarium spp etc), food (Carba beans and fava beans) and food supplements. In this context, the occurrence of false-positive results may lead to an unjustified invasive investigation and anti-fungal therapy. Purpose: The study was conducted to analyse of causal association of false positive galactomannan factors. Material and Methods: BAL samples from suspected respiratory tract infections were submitted for direct microscopic examination, GM detection and fungal culture. Results: Out of a total of 530 patients, 70 patients were in the case group (False positive GM) and 50 were in the control group (True positive). The average GMI of the case group was 2(1-4.2). and control group was 1.8(1-3.5). At a cut-off index of >1 false positive galactomannan results were observed maximum in patients who received Amoxiclav(48.5%), Piperacillin-tazobactam(33.3%), Amoxicillin(12.5%) followed by Meropenem(8.3%). The results showed a significant association(p-value <0.001) with false positive GM.. Other fungal agent colonization also had a higher GM index in the BAL sample but it is difficult to comment on association as the odds ratio was low (0.187). The odds were also lower (0.167) in dietary history to get false positive results and similarly with those on dietary supplements, but in contrast to these findings it was seen that the odd ratio was higher in patients suffering from tuberculosis(3.777) which can be attributed to increased colonization of aspergillus in TB patients. Conclusion: Galactomannan is the key biomarker of whether to start antifungal therapy for patients with IA and a higher mortality risk. Test results should be critically interpreted in the clinical context concerning potential causes of false-positive findings, especially with concomitant Piperacillin-tazobactam and amoxiclav use, other fungal infections and dietary history to prevent unnecessary antimycotic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.