ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Assessment of eVIN (Electronic Vaccine Intelligence Network) in utility and constraints of various stakeholders in Nainital District: A mixed method study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccines are important tools in the fight against many diseases for which eVIN was created. eVIN is working exceptionally, but the remaining gaps (electronic or non-electronic generated) are still present and cannot be assessed solely by the quantitative method. Thus, the objective of the present study was to assess the eVIN (Electronic Vaccine Intelligence Network) in utility and constraints of various stakeholders in Nainital District: A mixed method study. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was carried out among 8 available stakeholders in district Nainital, Uttarakhand. Open-ended KII was conducted individually. Results: Key informants comprised eight Stakeholders (7 medical officers in charge and one senior medical officer). The informants had a mean age of 40 ± 8 years with a mean experience of 10 ± 5 years. Big changes and benefits to the immunization program from eVIN were stated by all the stakeholders. The lacunas that remained and need further lookout, were the funds (for minor maintenance and purchase), the capacity building, more technical training, and the regular practices of vaccination. While in low-lying areas there were no major issues stated but for high altitude blocks, all stated persisting facing issues of road accessibility, mobile network, and CCE wear and tear, which makes them tough to carry for outreach sessions on foot. Thus, the findings suggest positive changes in the regions of vaccine usage, stock management distribution, and documentation. However, an Unreliable power supply at public health centers appears to be a continuous major challenge in maintaining the recommended temperature range. Adherence to good storage and handling practices, Supportive supervision, regular training, and budgetary provisions require the attention of higher-level management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.