ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Evaluation of different concentration techniques for microscopic diagnosis of protozoa and helminths in stool samples of children.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of intestinal parasites and associated risk factors among inmates at correctional facilities in Central Zambia.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2026Article
- Comparison of wet mount, Mini-FLOTAC and Midi Parasep® coprological techniques for the detection ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026Article
- Prevalence of intestinal parasite and associated factors among fruits and vegetables collected from local markets of woldia town, north east Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Subtypes of Blastocystis in Symptomatic Children in Egypt and Anti-Blastocystis Efficacy of Artemisia alba-Loaded Silver Nanoparticles In Vitro and in Swiss Albino Mice.Acta parasitologica · 2026Article
- Optimizing intestinal parasite detection: The need for enhanced diagnostic approaches.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) are prevalent among children in developing countries, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. These infections significantly impact physical and intellectual development and exacerbate nutritional deficiencies in early childhood. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study, conducted at AIIMS, Gorakhpur, from July to December 2023, involved 110 children aged six months to five years with diarrhea. The study compared the diagnostic performance of routine wet mount examination and stool concentration techniques (Formol-Ether Acetate Concentration [FAC] and Formal-Ether Concentration [FEC]) for identifying intestinal parasites. Result: FAC detected parasites in 75% of cases, FEC in 62%, and wet mount in 41%. Protozoan infections were predominant, with Blastocystis hominis, Entamoeba coli, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia lamblia being the most common. Dual infections were better detected by concentration methods. Conclusion: The study highlighted the higher sensitivity of FAC over FEC and wet mount techniques. Environmental, socioeconomic, and geographical factors influenced the prevalence and distribution of IPIs. The study emphasizes the need for improved public health measures, including health education, safe water, and sanitation facilities. The formol-ether acetate concentration technique is recommended for its higher recovery rate, safety, and feasibility in rural settings, requiring minimal infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.