ArticleCurrent treatment options in rheumatology2025
Treatment and Monitoring of Eosinophilic Fasciitis.
Article in Current treatment options in rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Favorable clinical outcomes of biologic and targeted therapies in refractory eosinophilic fasciitis: a case-based systematic review.Rheumatology international · 2026Pooled it
- Eosinophilic Fasciitis With Overlap Connective Tissue Disease: A Diagnostic Challenge in Progressive Skin Fibrosis.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- [A typical myofascial pain syndrome, or perhaps not? : Rare differential diagnosis].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Shulman syndrome: An atypical presentation of a rare disease].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Article
- [Eosinophilic fascitis: A case report and literature review].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Review
- Eosinophilic fasciitis.Medicina clinica · 2025Review
- Eosinophilic Fasciitis in a 78-Year-Old Man Following Pembrolizumab Treatment for Bladder Cancer.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Recurrent Eosinophilic Fasciitis: The First Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by skin induration. Although some guidelines from scientific societies exist, standard recommendations on monitoring and therapy are lacking. Recent Findings: Current therapy for patients diagnosed with EF includes glucocorticoids plus at least one immunosuppressive drug in cases of relapse or refractory disease. Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are the most recommended, although recently a myriad of case reports or small series reporting the effectivity of biological agents or JAK inhibitors for treating relapses or refractory disease have been published. Anti-IL5 may have a role in those rare refractory cases with persistent eosinophilia. Intravenous immunoglobulins and photopheresis (in those centers with experience) may act as adjuvant therapies. Monitoring the disease activity is a cornerstone to ascertain if the treatment is useful or not. MRI, PET/TC, and more specifically POCUS have recently demonstrated their value for assessing therapy response. Summary: High-quality data focused on therapy and monitoring is lacking in EF. Strategies for improving scientific quality of observational studies and consensus about "activity", "sequela", "relapse" or "refractoriness" terms in EF patients are necessary to implement prospective clinical trials and generate evidence-based medicine. Meanwhile we have to deal with the available information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.