Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115529›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in rheumatology2025

Treatment and Monitoring of Eosinophilic Fasciitis.

Albert Selva-O'Callaghan, Ernesto Trallero-Araguás, Albert Gil-Vila, Alfredo Guillen-Del Castillo, Ana Matas-García, Jose Cesar Milisenda, Carmen Pilar Simeon-Aznar, Iago Pinal-Fernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Shulman syndrome: An atypical presentation of a rare disease].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  6. [Eosinophilic fascitis: A case report and literature review].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Review
  7. Eosinophilic fasciitis.Medicina clinica · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Recurrent Eosinophilic Fasciitis: The First Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Albert Selva-O'CallaghanSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron General Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2823-9761
Ernesto Trallero-AraguásRheumatology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert Gil-VilaSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron General Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfredo Guillen-Del CastilloSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron General Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Matas-GarcíaMuscle Research Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona University, CIBERER and IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Cesar MilisendaMuscle Research Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona University, CIBERER and IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen Pilar Simeon-AznarSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron General Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Iago Pinal-FernandezMuscle Disease Unit, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AR999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by skin induration. Although some guidelines from scientific societies exist, standard recommendations on monitoring and therapy are lacking. Recent Findings: Current therapy for patients diagnosed with EF includes glucocorticoids plus at least one immunosuppressive drug in cases of relapse or refractory disease. Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are the most recommended, although recently a myriad of case reports or small series reporting the effectivity of biological agents or JAK inhibitors for treating relapses or refractory disease have been published. Anti-IL5 may have a role in those rare refractory cases with persistent eosinophilia. Intravenous immunoglobulins and photopheresis (in those centers with experience) may act as adjuvant therapies. Monitoring the disease activity is a cornerstone to ascertain if the treatment is useful or not. MRI, PET/TC, and more specifically POCUS have recently demonstrated their value for assessing therapy response. Summary: High-quality data focused on therapy and monitoring is lacking in EF. Strategies for improving scientific quality of observational studies and consensus about "activity", "sequela", "relapse" or "refractoriness" terms in EF patients are necessary to implement prospective clinical trials and generate evidence-based medicine. Meanwhile we have to deal with the available information.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic fasciitisGroove signImmunosuppressive treatmentMonitoringUnmet needs

Identifiers

PMID40115529
PMCPMC11922073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.