ReviewCentral European journal of urology2024
Safety and efficacy of non-surgical treatments for chronic post-radiation cystitis: a systematic review.
Review in Central European journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postoperative complications following simple cystectomy for radiation-induced bladder dysfunction compared to radical cystectomy: A matched cohort study.Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Post-radiation cystitis is a complication of external beam radiation therapy, for the radical treatment of pelvic malignancies as radical treatment for pelvic malignancies. Chronic, refractory, post-radiation cystitis is problematic in its management, mainly when a conservative approach is preferred. Conservative methods are the first line of treatment, especially since the area has been irradiated, making surgical treatment more challenging.The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of conservative methods for the management of post-radiation cystitis. All non-invasive methods were included in the research, in patients over 18 years of age undergoing pelvic radiation therapy. Material and methods: We conducted a systematic search for comparable studies on the conservative treatment of chronic post-radiation cystitis, analysing the efficacy and safety of these techniques, based on a specific protocol. The PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases and the grey literature were searched. Risk control of the individual papers was carried out using the RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: A total of 282 papers were reviewed, of which 6 were included in the review: 3 randomised clinical trials and 3 non-randomised studies. Each of these studies investigated a different treatment, using a different population as control group, so it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis of the studies. Conclusions: Although most conservative measures appear to be successful in the management of post-radiation cystitis, more studies, especially randomised clinical trials, are needed before an algorithm of conservative methods can be created.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.