ArticleCentral European journal of urology2024
What kind of water should I advise my kidney stone patient to drink: the Dutch experience.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To compare the mineral content of commercially available water (tap and bottled) in the Netherlands and to evaluate which type of water should be recommended for kidney stone patients. Material and methods: All Dutch water supply companies were contacted to request water analysis reports of tap water. Bottled still and sparkling water available in the 5 main supermarket chains in the Netherlands were also included. Information regarding the mineral composition of bottled waters was read from the manufacturers' ingredient label on the bottles. Data regarding sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, and sulphate content were evaluated. Results: All Dutch water supply companies, consisting of 179 production locations, were included. Twenty-one bottled still waters and 25 bottled sparkling waters were included. There was a wide range of results for the evaluated minerals. Sodium levels were highest in tap water (134.0 mg/l), whereas potassium concentrations were highest in bottled water (18.0 mg/l). Bicarbonate, calcium, and sulphate concentrations were highest in bottled still water (432.0 mg/l, 240.0 mg/l, and 400.0 mg/l, respectively). Magnesium levels were highest in bottled sparkling water (51.4 mg/l). Conclusions: Commercially available water (bottled and tap) in the Netherlands is safe to use for KSD patients. However, specific bottled waters can be described as calcium and magnesium rich. Therefore, it remains important for KSD patients and their physicians to realise that the mineral composition of drinking water may vary, and its consumption might require alterations of their diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.