ArticleCentral European journal of urology2024
Impact of obesity on peri-operative and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity represents a worldwide epidemic disorder, increasing the overall morbidity and mortality rate. In this study we assessed the impact of obesity on perioperative and long-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). Material and methods: Baseline measurements of uroflowmetry and validated questionnaire responses were prospectively recorded, which were repeated at follow-up. Composite outcomes (trifecta) were defined as combination of post-operative Q-max >15 ml/s, IPSS score <8, and absence of complications. Pentafecta included 2 additional criteria, namely post-operative ejaculation persistence (MSHQ score >0) and erectile function maintenance (ΔIEEF <6). Data analysis was stratified by BMI (<30 or ≥30). Results: Eighty-one patients underwent RASP in our institution. Baseline demographic and clinical features, questionnaire scores, and baseline uroflowmetry results showed no significant differences between obese and non-obese cohorts. However, during follow-up, obese patients reported less improvement in IPSS (p = 0.02) and OABQ scores (p <0.001), along with a higher incidence of stress incontinence requiring duloxetine (p <0.001). Uroflowmetry outcomes were also lower in the obesity group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03 for Qmax [ml/s] and post-void residual [ml], respectively). However, when considering assessment of comprehensive outcomes, obese patients demonstrated similar rates of achieving trifecta (67% vs 54%, p = 0.39) and pentafecta (p = 0.76) compared to non-obese patients. Conclusions: Our results show that obesity is associated with poorer functional outcomes. Specifically concerning storage LUTS and incontinence rates following RASP. However, no impact of obesity on the achievement rates of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.