Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115472›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2024

Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy with a single-use 7.5Fr ureteroscope: a multicenter prospective pilot study.

Victoria Jahrreiss, Mahir Akram, Vincent De Coninck, Guido Kamphuis, Joyce Baard, Oriol Angerri, Esteban Emiliani, Sarah Schippers, Eva Van Bos, Kim Pauwaert and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Victoria JahrreissDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mahir AkramUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Vincent De ConinckDepartment of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium, Brasschaat, Belgium.
Guido KamphuisDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyce BaardDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oriol AngerriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Esteban EmilianiDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sarah SchippersDepartment of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium, Brasschaat, Belgium.
Eva Van BosDepartment of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Kim PauwaertDepartment of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas TaillyEAU Section on Urolithiasis (EULIS).
Amelia PietropaoloUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Bhaskar SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment of kidney stone disease (KSD) has evolved significantly with the introduction of minimally invasive endourological techniques. Advancements in technology, particularly the transition from fibreoptic to digital and single use systems and the development of smaller-diameter instruments, has improved intraoperative view and efficacy in stone treatment. The miniaturization in single-use scopes represent a recent innovation, offering potential benefits, especially in challenging cases. However, there is limited evidence on their safety and clinical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stone treatment using a single-use 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope. Material and methods: Consecutive patients with urinary stones undergoing flexible ureteroscopy with a 7.5 Fr single-use flexible ureteroscope across five tertiary endourology centers were included. Data on patient demographics, stone characteristics, intra- and postoperative outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed. Procedures were performed by experienced endourology surgeons following standard protocols. Results: 50 patients with a mean age of 54.5 years (IQR: 25-65.8) and a male to female ratio of 34:16 underwent flexible ureteroscopy (FURS). Mean cumulative stone size was 18.9 mm (SD ±10.9 mm) with a mean stone volume of 2031.2 mm Conclusions: This multicentric study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of using the 7.5Fr single-use flexible ureteroscope for urinary stone treatment. While the results are promising, larger studies are needed to validate these findings further.

Indexed as

clinical outcomeskidney calculilasersingle-use scopeureteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40115472
PMCPMC11921952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.