Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115471›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2024

Risk-adapted scoring model to identify candidates benefiting from adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy in nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma with ≤pT2.

Sung Jun Sou, Won Ik Seo, Jae Il Chung, Hyun Seok Lee, Kweon Sik Min, Soo Jin Jung, Chan Ho Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sung Jun SouDepartment of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Won Ik SeoDepartment of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jae Il ChungDepartment of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Seok LeeDepartment of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Kweon Sik MinDepartment of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Soo Jin JungDepartment of Pathology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Chan Ho LeeDepartment of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: After radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is recommended in either muscle invasive or lymph node positive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, optimal patient selection remains to be studied. We propose a risk-adapted scoring model for selecting patients for AC in localised UTUC with ≤pT2. Material and methods: The model was based on 7 risk factors modified from the risk stratification system in the European Association of Urology guideline for localised UTUC. Each risk factor indicated one point; total scores were used to categorise patients as at low or high risk for disease recurrence. We applied our model to 135 patients with localised UTUC with ≤pT2, who underwent RNU without AC. Recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were analysed based on risk group. Results: A risk score of ≥4 points indicated high risk (33/135 patients [24.4%]). The accuracy of predicting recurrence was 82.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.5-88.9%) with a negative predictive value of 93.1% (95% CI: 87.9-96.2%). Disease recurred in 51.5% of high-risk patients and 6.9% of low-risk patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that high-risk was independently associated with recurrence and cancer-specific death (hazard ratio [HR] = 10.20, 95% CI: 3.94-26.44%, HR = 8.72, 95% CI: 2.47-30.73%, all p <0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The risk-adapted scoring model might be an effective way for selecting patients who may benefit from AC after RNU in nonmetastatic UTUC with ≤pT2. These results should be validated in a larger, prospective study.

Indexed as

adjuvantchemotherapynephroureterectomyrisk-adapted scoring modelupper urinary tract

Identifiers

PMID40115471
PMCPMC11921937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.