Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115468›Full record

ReviewCentral European journal of urology2024

Understanding the role of surveys in modern urology: an insight into survey trends over the decades.

Carlotta Nedbal, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Pietro Tramanzoli, Martina Maggi, Carlo Giulioni, Virgilio De Stefano, Rossella Nicoletti, Maria Pia Pavia, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Ee Jean Lim and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Central European journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Carlotta NedbalUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Steffi Kar Kei YuenDepartment of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Pietro TramanzoliUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Martina MaggiDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Carlo GiulioniUrology Unit, Villa Igea, Ancona, Italy.
Virgilio De StefanoUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Rossella NicolettiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Science, University of Florence, Italy.
Maria Pia PaviaUrology Unit, Murri Hospital, Fermo, Italy.
Giacomo Maria PirolaUrology Department, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.
Ee Jean LimDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Chu Ann ChaiUrology Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Malaya.
Wei Zheng SoDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Andrea Benedetto GalosiUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Vineet GauharNg teng Fong General Hospital, Department of Urology, NUHS, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To provide a comprehensive review of survey trends in urology, aiming to provide insight into changes in publication in the new millennium. Surveys in healthcare allow for a better understanding of the knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns as well as gaps in healthcare systems. Material and methods: A comprehensive review of all "surveys in urology answered by urologists" was performed through the PubMed and Scopus databases, according to the SPICE framework. Included surveys were divided according to the subject: "Uro-oncology", "Urolithiasis", "Mental health" "Resident training", and "Miscellaneous". Publications were then divided into 2 main periods: Period-1 (2000-2011) and Period-2 (2012-2023). Results: A total of 361 surveys have been published since 2000, with a significant overall increasing trend in the recent decade (p <0.001). A significantly increasing focus is seen for publications on resident training (n = 86; +660%; p = 0.003), mental health (n = 31; +650%; p = 0.001), urolithiasis (n = 40; +371%; p = 0.002), and uro-oncology (n = 94; +230%, p ≤0.001). In subanalysis, the largest increase in publications was noted for surveys on radical prostatectomy (+175%, p = 0.024), surgical treatment of urolithiasis (+320%, p = 0.040), quality of resident education (+483%, p <0.001), and personal satisfaction with resident training (+500%, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Over the decades, surveys have served as an effective interactive tool for urologists to engage and investigate different aspects of practice and training across sub-specialties. In modern times, better evaluation tools integrated with AI will provide a bigger platform for urologists to use surveys as part of their armamentarium to address and evaluate not only clinical practices but also emotional challenges, training needs, and inequalities that hinder progress in urology.

Indexed as

disparitiesquestionnairessurveytrendsurologistsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40115468
PMCPMC11921954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.