ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Aortic dissection in children: case report and literature review.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular repair of a complicated acute type B aortic dissection in a pediatric patient with visceral and lower-extremity malperfusion.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Patent ductus arteriosus stenting complicated by iatrogenic aortic dissection requiring aortic repair.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- A Rare Case of Aortic Dissection 10 Years Post Percutaneous Catheterization Retrieval of an Embolized PDA Device in a Patient with Down Syndrome.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aortic dissection is rare in both children and adults. Misdiagnosis is common because of hidden symptoms, insufficient knowledge among pediatricians, and lack of consensus and guidelines. We aimed to report the clinical features of patients and enhance the diagnostic awareness of aortic dissection in children with acute chest pain or trauma, avoid delayed diagnosis and the subsequent worsening of clinical outcomes. Case Description: We presented three cases of pediatric aortic dissection and summarized our findings from the literature. We treated a 13-year-old boy with Stanford Type A aortic dissection, a 9-year-old boy with Stanford Type B aortic dissection, and an 11-year-old boy with Stanford Type A aortic dissection. Two patients had spontaneous aortic lesions, one had a traumatic aortic lesion, and all three were discharged from our hospital after thoracotomy. We searched the Medline database using PubMed and platforms such as Springer Link and Google Scholar with the search terms "aortic dissection" and "pediatric" or "children". We retrieved 27 reports describing 34 cases of aortic dissection in patients aged ≤16 years published from 1990 to 2024 to summarize the characteristics of precipitating factors, aortic dissection status, and clinical presentations. Conclusions: The prognosis of children with aortic dissection after treatment is generally better than that of adults. In pediatric emergency settings, persistent chest pain that does not alleviate and cannot be attributed to common illnesses warrants heightened suspicion of aortic dissection. Surgical treatment should be promptly performed once the condition is diagnosed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.