Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115357›Full record

ArticleRevista Cuidarte

[Access and waiting for ostomy according to people with colorectal cancer: an ethnographic studyAcceso y espera para la ostomía según las personas con cáncer colorrectal: un estudio etnográfico].

Antonio Jorge Silva, Thaís Cristina Flexa Souza, Mary Elizabeth de Santana, Helena Megumi Sonobe, Ingrid Magali de Souza Pimentel, Jacira Nunes Carvalho

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antonio Jorge Silva. Universidade de Sáo Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeiráo Preto - USP. Ribeiráo Preto, Sáo Paulo, Brasil. Email: juniorjorge 94@hotmail.com Universidade de São Paulo Universidade de Sáo Paulo Brazil juniorjorge 94@hotmail.com.
Thaís Cristina Flexa Souza. Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA. Belém, Pará, Brasil. Email: thaisflexxa@gmail.com Universidade Federal do Pará Universidade Federal do Pará Brazil thaisflexxa@gmail.com.
Mary Elizabeth de Santana. Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA. Belém, Pará, Brasil. Email: marybete@ufpa.br Universidade Federal do Pará Universidade Federal do Pará Brazil marybete@ufpa.br.
Helena Megumi Sonobe. Universidade de Sáo Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeiráo Preto - USP. Ribeiráo Preto, Sáo Paulo, Brasil. Email: megumi@eerp.usp.br Universidade de São Paulo Universidade de Sáo Paulo Brazil megumi@eerp.usp.br.
Ingrid Magali de Souza Pimentel. Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA. Belém, Pará, Brasil. Email: imbarleta@yahoo.com.br Universidade Federal do Pará Universidade Federal do Pará Brazil imbarleta@yahoo.com.br.
Jacira Nunes Carvalho. Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA. Belém, Pará, Brasil. Email: jacirancarvalho@gmail.com Universidade Federal do Pará Universidade Federal do Pará Brazil jacirancarvalho@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The access of people with colorectal cancer to surgical treatment with stomization implies a difficult itinerary through the network of care, and when accessing the tertiary level in an apprehensive preoperative waiting. Objective: To know the access and waiting for stomization of people sick with colorectal cancer at the tertiary level of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Materials and Methods: Ethnographic study based on the Sociology of Health, with 8 relatives and 14 patients in a High Complexity Oncology Center, Brazil. Data were collected between October 2018 to March 2019, with participant and non-participant observation, field diary recording, and semi-structured interview. Statements and ethnographic notes after triangulation were subjected to inductive content analysis in six steps. Results: "The history of illness interspersed with difficulties" and "The losses in the process of patience-resilience along the way" were apprehended. Discussion: Three types of access were reported, as well as the sub meanings "I paid privately" and the diagnostic delay mobilized by official and unofficial means in the Unified Health System. Social capital is pressing, a network without which users' access is impacted. At the tertiary level while waiting for stomization, resilience was unveiled not as a heroic resource, but as a personal and collective resource. Conclusion: The access counted on relational mobilization and a range of paths to hospitalization with part of the journey in supplementary health, while the waiting for stomization mitigates patience making resilience a beneficial resource in the wait for surgical programming.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHealth Services AccessibilityMedicalizationSociology, Medical.Unified Health System

Identifiers

PMID40115357
PMCPMC11559274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.