Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Analysis of the application of policy instruments for close-knit county medical communities based on Hood's classification.

Huang Xianlu, Feng Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huang XianluCollege of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Feng LeiCollege of Marxism, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: By analyzing the selection and application of policy instruments in the construction of close-knit county medical communities in Dazu District, Chongqing, this study aimed to propose countermeasures to optimize these policy instruments, offering valuable lessons for the construction of close-knit county medical communities. Methods: Based on Hood's classification, an analytical framework was constructed that incorporated the selection of basic policy instruments (X dimension) and the different phases in the construction process (Y dimension). Nvivo was used to analyze policy documents (2015-2023) related to the construction of close-knit county medical communities in Dazu District. Results: In the X dimension, the nodality-based instruments accounted for 14.3%, the authority-based instruments accounted for 34.2%, the treasure-based instruments accounted for 16.4%, and the organization-based instruments accounted for 35.2%. In the Y dimension, the total number of policy instruments used in Dazu District across the following three phases-policy initiation, piloting, and promotion-showed an increasing trend, aligning with the number of policies. These statistics indicated several issues such as limited use of nodality-based and treasure-based instruments, an incomplete policy assessment indicator system, insufficient policy synergy and incentives, and a lack of operationalization of strategic measures. Conclusion: The government should increase the use of nodality-based and treasure-based instruments, improve the assessment indicator system, strengthen policy synergy mechanisms and incentives, and optimize the structure of talent resources to improve the operability of the policies.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingChinaHumansChongqing municipalityclose-knit county medical communitiescontent analysisHood’s classificationpolicy instruments

Identifiers

PMID40115351
PMCPMC11922954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.