ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Research on prediction model of adolescent suicide and self-injury behavior based on machine learning algorithm.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying past-year self-reported suicidality in outpatients with somatic symptom disorder using an interpretable machine-learning model: a multicenter study with an online calculator.BMC psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Visualized Analysis of Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury and Comorbidity Networks.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating multiple feature assessment methods to identify key predictors of repeat suicide attempts in Taiwan.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the risk factors that affect adolescents' suicidal and self-injurious behaviors and to construct a prediction model for adolescents' suicidal and self-injurious behaviors based on machine learning algorithms. Methods: Stratified cluster sampling was used to select high school students in Chongqing, yielding 3,000 valid questionnaires. Based on whether students had engaged in suicide or self-injury, they were categorized into a suicide/self-injury group (n=78) and a non-suicide/self-injury group (n=2,922). Gender, age, insomnia, and mental illness data were compared between the two groups, and a logistic regression model was used to analyze independent risk factors for adolescent suicidal and self-injurious behavior. Six methods-multi-level perceptron, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, logistic regression, and extreme gradient boosting-were used to build predictive models. Various model indicators for suicidal and self-injurious behavior were compared across the six algorithms using a confusion matrix to identify the optimal model. Result: In the self-injury and suicide groups, the proportions of male adolescents, late adolescence, insomnia, and mental illness were significantly higher than in the non-suicide and self-injury groups ( Conclusion: The detection rate of suicidal and self-injurious behaviors is higher in women than in men. Adolescents displaying impulsiveness, psychoticism, neuroticism, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, and paranoia have a greater likelihood of engaging in such behaviors. The machine learning model for classifying and predicting adolescent suicide and self-injury risk effectively identifies these behaviors, enabling targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.