Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115313›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Research on prediction model of adolescent suicide and self-injury behavior based on machine learning algorithm.

Yao Gan, Li Kuang, Xiao-Ming Xu, Ming Ai, Jing-Lan He, Wo Wang, Su Hong, Jian Mei Chen, Jun Cao, Qi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yao GanDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li KuangDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiao-Ming XuDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ming AiDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jing-Lan HeDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wo WangMental Health Center, University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Su HongDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jian Mei ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jun CaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the risk factors that affect adolescents' suicidal and self-injurious behaviors and to construct a prediction model for adolescents' suicidal and self-injurious behaviors based on machine learning algorithms. Methods: Stratified cluster sampling was used to select high school students in Chongqing, yielding 3,000 valid questionnaires. Based on whether students had engaged in suicide or self-injury, they were categorized into a suicide/self-injury group (n=78) and a non-suicide/self-injury group (n=2,922). Gender, age, insomnia, and mental illness data were compared between the two groups, and a logistic regression model was used to analyze independent risk factors for adolescent suicidal and self-injurious behavior. Six methods-multi-level perceptron, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, logistic regression, and extreme gradient boosting-were used to build predictive models. Various model indicators for suicidal and self-injurious behavior were compared across the six algorithms using a confusion matrix to identify the optimal model. Result: In the self-injury and suicide groups, the proportions of male adolescents, late adolescence, insomnia, and mental illness were significantly higher than in the non-suicide and self-injury groups ( Conclusion: The detection rate of suicidal and self-injurious behaviors is higher in women than in men. Adolescents displaying impulsiveness, psychoticism, neuroticism, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, and paranoia have a greater likelihood of engaging in such behaviors. The machine learning model for classifying and predicting adolescent suicide and self-injury risk effectively identifies these behaviors, enabling targeted interventions.

Indexed as

adolescentsmachine learning algorithmprediction modelrisk factorssuicidal and self-injurious behavior

Identifiers

PMID40115313
PMCPMC11922950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.