ArticleRevista Cuidarte
Clinical aspects of human mpox cases in the global scenario: an integrative review.
Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of HIV coinfection on mpox patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, human-to-human transmission of MPXV has been frequently reported. Despite this, there is a lack of studies with strong evidence to guide the care practice focused on cases of human mpox. Objective: To analyze scientific evidence in the literature that addresses clinical aspects related to cases of human mpox on the global scenario. Materials and Methods: Integrative review conducted using five databases: SCOPUS, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE/PubMed and CINAHL. The last date of database access was October 3, 2024. The selection of studies and review report followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Results: With a sample of 58 studies, the main findings were aspects related to signs and symptoms, transmission, diagnosis, prevention and care for the multidisciplinary and nursing teams. Discussion: No studies were found that frequently and specifically addressed the care for the multidisciplinary team and, above all, the nursing team. Therefore, the results ofthis review mayfacilitate the management of patients with MPXV-related infections. Conclusions: This study promoted the collection of scientific evidence that supports the care for patients with human mpox for the multidisciplinary team and the nursing team, which contributes to prevention, early detection and treatment of MPXV infection and its possible complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.