ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
A scoping review and analysis of a series of country experiences to inform the Chilean health financing reform.
Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze international health reform experiences to inform Chile's health financing reform efforts. Methods: A scoping review methodology was used. Six countries that met inclusion criteria were used for the comparative analysis: Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Slovenia, and Spain. A profile was prepared for each country describing the financing system, the structures in charge of managing the public health insurance system, and the institution responsible for financing and its attributions regarding healthcare providers. Results: The search identified 188 records, from which the country profiles were created. We narratively analyze the findings, focusing on a) financing (revenue collection and pooling), b) purchaser-provider relationship and payment mechanisms, c) governance of institutional capacities and policies for reform, and d) voluntary private health insurance. For each of these dimensions, we make focused recommendations that could aid the ongoing effort on healthcare reform in Chile to move toward universal public insurance with a mixed payment mechanism for public and private providers. We also discuss the type of institutional governance required and the transition from mandatory to complementary private insurance. Conclusions: Our analysis and underlying assumptions allow us to provide recommendations for the current reform process in Chile, focusing on the advancement of universal public insurance with a mixed payment mechanism for public and private providers, the type of institutional governance to be developed to achieve it, and the transition from the current mandatory private insurance to complementary private insurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.