Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115242›Full record

ArticleComputers in human behavior2025

Worldwide connections of influencers who promote e-cigarettes on Instagram and TikTok: a social network analysis.

Julia Vassey, Herbert Ho-Chun Chang, Tom Valente, Jennifer B Unger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in human behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia VasseyDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Herbert Ho-Chun ChangProgram in Quantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH.
Tom ValenteDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Jennifer B UngerDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Adam Matthew Leventhal · 2018 to 2026
$39.0M
Evaluating the impact of e-cigarette social media marketing on e-cigarette use among underage youth.R01CA260459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI UNGER, JENNIFER BETH · 2021 to 2023
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260459NCI NIH HHS U54 CA180905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to e-cigarette marketing on social media is a risk factor for e-cigarette use among youth. Tobacco brands use influencers to promote e-cigarettes on social media; however, influencer marketing has not been sufficiently studied. This study explored network connections and interactions through comments on social media posts between global nano- and micro-influencers (influencers with approximately 1,000 to 100,000 followers) and their audiences on Instagram and TikTok. We constructed directed unipartite networks among Instagram (N = 104) and TikTok (N = 100) influencers and users on Instagram (N = 55,622) and TikTok (N = 68,673) who commented on these influencers' posts in 2021-2022 (including influencers who commented on each other's posts). Comments to posts of users who were not classified as influencers were not collected. The Instagram network was denser (more interconnected) and active compared to the TikTok network (1.48 times higher density, 281 times higher transitivity, and 85 times higher reciprocity). Both Instagram and TikTok networks contained heterophilic ties (i.e., influencers from different geographic regions such as Asia, North America and Europe connected to each other), indicating that influencers from different geographic regions engage with (comment on) each other's content, potentially exposing audiences to a wide variety of e-cigarette content. Influencers who promote e-cigarettes and post about lifestyle topics (e.g., fitness, fashion, gaming) occupy more central positions in the Instagram and TikTok networks than influencers who focus primarily on e-cigarette promotion, potentially exposing users who are not interested in tobacco-related content to harmful imagery of e-cigarettes. The findings emphasize the need for strengthening influencer marketing regulation on social media platforms popular among youth.

Indexed as

e-cigarettesinfluencersInstagramsocial networkTikTok

Identifiers

PMID40115242
PMCPMC11922560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.