ArticleFrontiers in big data2025
(KAUH-BCMD) dataset: advancing mammographic breast cancer classification with multi-fusion preprocessing and residual depth-wise network.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic literature review on mammography: deep learning techniques for breast cancer detection with global and Asian perspectives.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- A cross data learning architecture for breast cancer classification using mammograms.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2026Article
- Obovatol induces apoptosis in breast cancer by downregulating the PI3K/Akt pathway.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Radiomics and Deep Learning: Bridging Breast Cancer Imaging Phenotypes and Genomic Heterogeneity.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Advancing Precision, Accuracy, and Early Detection in Cancer Diagnosis.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The categorization of benign and malignant patterns in digital mammography is a critical step in the diagnosis of breast cancer, facilitating early detection and potentially saving many lives. Diverse breast tissue architectures often obscure and conceal breast issues. Classifying worrying regions (benign and malignant patterns) in digital mammograms is a significant challenge for radiologists. Even for specialists, the first visual indicators are nuanced and irregular, complicating identification. Therefore, radiologists want an advanced classifier to assist in identifying breast cancer and categorizing regions of concern. This study presents an enhanced technique for the classification of breast cancer using mammography images. The collection comprises real-world data from King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) at Jordan University of Science and Technology, consisting of 7,205 photographs from 5,000 patients aged 18-75. After being classified as benign or malignant, the pictures underwent preprocessing by rescaling, normalization, and augmentation. Multi-fusion approaches, such as high-boost filtering and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), were used to improve picture quality. We created a unique Residual Depth-wise Network (RDN) to enhance the precision of breast cancer detection. The suggested RDN model was compared with many prominent models, including MobileNetV2, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionV3, Xception, and DenseNet121. The RDN model exhibited superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 97.82%, precision of 96.55%, recall of 99.19%, specificity of 96.45%, F1 score of 97.85%, and validation accuracy of 96.20%. The findings indicate that the proposed RDN model is an excellent instrument for early diagnosis using mammography images and significantly improves breast cancer detection when integrated with multi-fusion and efficient preprocessing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.