Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115233›Full record

ReviewRevista Cuidarte

[Safe practices in airway management of patients with Covid-19: integrative reviewPrácticas seguras en el manejo de la vía aérea de pacientes con Covid-19: revisión integradora].

Cristina da Silva-Fernandes, Maria Girlane Sousa Albuquerque-Brandão, Magda Milleyde de Sousa-Lima, Jennara Cândido-do-Nascimento, Nelson Miguel Galindo-Neto, Lívia Moreira-Barros

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Revista Cuidarte
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristina da Silva-FernandesUniversidade Estadual Vale do Acaraú (UVA), Sobral-CE, Brasil, E-mail: cristina.sednanref@gmail. com Autor correspondente Universidade Estadual do Vale do Acaraú Universidade Estadual Vale do Acaraú (UVA) Brazil cristina.sednanref@gmail. com.
Maria Girlane Sousa Albuquerque-BrandãoUniversidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro- Brasileira (UNILAB), Redenção-CE, Brasil. E-mail: girlane.albuquerque@yahoo. com.br Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro- Brasileira (UNILAB) Brasil girlane.albuquerque@yahoo. com.br.
Magda Milleyde de Sousa-LimaUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza-CE, Brasil. E-mail: limamilleyde@gmail.com Universidade Federal do Ceará Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) Brazil limamilleyde@gmail.com.
Jennara Cândido-do-NascimentoUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza-CE, Brasil. E-mail: jennaracandido@yahoo.com.br Universidade Federal do Ceará Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) Brazil jennaracandido@yahoo.com.br.
Nelson Miguel Galindo-NetoInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco (IFPE), Pesqueira-PE, Brasil. E-mail: nelsonmiguelnt@hotmail.com Instituto Federal de Educação Brasil nelsonmiguelnt@hotmail.com.
Lívia Moreira-BarrosUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza-CE, Brasil. E-mail: livia.moreirab@hotmail.com Universidade Federal do Ceará Universidade Federal do Ceará Brazil livia.moreirab@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus in early 2020 changed the practices of health professionals in order to mitigate the risks of contamination of health care frontline workers, mainly activities related to the management of the airways of patients with Covid-19. Objective: to identify the practices necessary to ensure the safety of health professionals in managing the airway of patients suspected or diagnosed with Covid-19. Materials and methods: an integrative review carried out in ten relevant databases in the health area, with the sample consisting of 17 surveys. The practices identified were listed according to the four procedures punctuated by the literature: endotracheal intubation, extubation, bronchoscopy and tracheostomy. Results: the main recommendations mentioned were: endotracheal intubation: performed by an experienced, trained, minimal team and professionals from risk groups for covid-19 should not be part of this team; extubation: do not use a high flow nasal catheter after the procedure; bronchoscopy: perform in an isolated room with negative pressure; tracheostomy: may be considered early, but the risk-benefit must be assessed. Conclusion: the practices identified may direct the management of airways and guide the construction of assistive, educational or managerial technologies.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementBetacoronavirusNursingOccupational Health

Identifiers

PMID40115233
PMCPMC11297411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.