Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115175›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Development and validation of machine learning models with blood-based digital biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: a multicohort diagnostic study.

Bin Jiao, Ziyu Ouyang, Xuewen Xiao, Cong Zhang, Tianyan Xu, Qijie Yang, Yuan Zhu, Yiliang Liu, Xixi Liu, Yafang Zhou and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Bin JiaoDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ziyu OuyangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xuewen XiaoDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Cong ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Tianyan XuDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qijie YangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yuan ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yiliang LiuDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xixi LiuDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yafang ZhouNational Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xinxin LiaoNational Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shilin LuoDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Beisha TangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhigang LiCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Lu ShenDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves complex alterations in biological pathways, making comprehensive blood biomarkers crucial for accurate and earlier diagnosis. However, the cost-effectiveness and operational complexity of method using blood-based biomarkers significantly limit its availability in clinical practice. Methods: We developed low-cost, convenient machine learning-based with digital biomarkers (MLDB) using plasma spectra data to detect AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from healthy controls (HCs) and discriminate AD from different types of neurodegenerative diseases. Retrospective data were gathered for 1324 individuals, including 293 with amyloid beta positive AD, 151 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 106 with Lewy body dementia (DLB), 106 with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), 135 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and 533 healthy controls (HCs) between July 2017 and August 2023. Findings: Random forest classifier and feature selection procedures were used to select digital biomarkers. MLDB achieved area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.92 (AD vs. HC, Sensitivity 88.2%, specificity 84.1%), 0.89 (MCI vs. HC, Sensitivity 88.8%, specificity 86.4%), 0.83 (AD vs. DLB, Sensitivity 77.2%, specificity 74.6%), 0.80 (AD vs. FTD, sensitivity 74.2%, specificity 72.4%), and 0.93 (AD vs. PSP, sensitivity 76.1%, specificity 75.7%). Digital biomarkers distinguishing AD from HC were negatively correlated with plasma p-tau217 ( Interpretation: The ATR-FTIR (Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared) plasma spectra features can identify AD-related pathological changes. These spectral features serve as digital biomarkers, providing valuable support in the early screening and diagnosis of AD. Funding: The National Natural Science Foundation of China, STI2030-Major Projects, National Key R&D Program of China, Outstanding Youth Fund of Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation, Hunan Health Commission Grant, Science and Technology Major Project of Hunan Province, Hunan Innovative Province Construction Project, Grant of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital and Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseBlood-based digital biomarkersDiagnosisMachine learningNeurodegenerative diseasesSpectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40115175
PMCPMC11925590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.