ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Global estimates of rotavirus vaccine efficacy and effectiveness: a rapid review and meta-regression analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune response to rotavirus vaccines in low- and middle-income countries: Challenges and perspectives.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Review
- Early-life gut microbiome composition and rotavirus vaccine-induced IgA responses in U.S. infants: a longitudinal cohort study.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Rotavirus mucosal immunology: insights and research priorities from an international convening in Liverpool, March 2024.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Emergence of human enteric adenovirus F41 among children with gastroenteritis in North-central Bangladesh, 2022-2024.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Zoonotic Spillover of a Canine-like Rotavirus A G3P[3] Strain in a Brazilian Child.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Cost-Effective Threshold Price for Alternative Infant and Neonatal Rotavirus Vaccines: A Dual-Country Evaluation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The adult nasal mucosa is defined by distinct immune profiles that modulate in-vitro SARS-CoV-2 infection.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- The adult nasal mucosa is defined by distinct immune profiles that modulate in-vitro SARS-CoV-2 infection.Research square · 2026Article
- Article
- Tracing the Zoonotic Origins of a Rare Human G5P[6] Rotavirus in Brazil.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rotavirus Quantification and Genotyping in Wastewater: A Molecular Surveillance Study in Italy (2024-2025).Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Genomic Landscape of G2P[6] Rotavirus a Strains in Brazil: Evolutionary and Epidemiological Perspectives.Viruses · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Rotavirus is the leading cause of diarrhoea worldwide, particularly affecting young children. While national rotavirus immunization programs have reduced rotavirus morbidity and mortality, vaccine performance varies considerably between high-income and low-income settings. Methods: We updated a previous systematic review of studies reporting rotavirus vaccine efficacy and vaccine effectiveness against severe rotavirus-associated gastroenteritis (RVGE) by performing a rapid review from July 1, 2020 through October 16, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials reporting vaccine efficacy against severe RVGE and case-control and cohort studies reporting vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization with RVGE in children <5 years old for current internationally licensed vaccines. We developed a meta-regression model for vaccine efficacy and effectiveness using widely available country-specific predictors of rotavirus vaccine performance and simultaneously estimated the relationship between vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. We used the model to predict vaccine efficacy and effectiveness for all countries and assessed its predictive accuracy using a modified leave-one-country-out validation approach. Findings: Predicted vaccine efficacy ranged from 69.6% to 94.3% across countries in the Americas, European, and Western Pacific Regions, with a decreased efficacy ranging from 18.6% to 85.3% in the African, South-East Asian, and Eastern Mediterranean regions. Estimates of vaccine effectiveness were generally lower than vaccine efficacy when efficacy was greater than 60%, but effectiveness was predicted to be higher when vaccine efficacy was low. A strong correlation ( Interpretation: Our approach enhances the understanding of global variation in rotavirus vaccine performance and can be used to inform predictions of the potential impact of rotavirus vaccines for countries that have yet to introduce them. Higher-quality data on predictor variables and broader regional representation in vaccine trials are required for more robust vaccine performance estimates. Funding: National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI112970) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-17940).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.