Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115170›Full record

ArticleContact (Thousand Oaks (Ventura County, Calif.))

Comparative Analysis of SPLICS and MCS-DETECT for Detecting Mitochondria-ER Contact Sites (MERCs).

Jieyi Zheng, Ben Cardoen, Milene Ortiz-Silva, Ghassan Hamarneh, Ivan R Nabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contact (Thousand Oaks (Ventura County, Calif.)). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jieyi ZhengDepartment of Cellular & Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7519-6719
Ben CardoenSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-1165
Milene Ortiz-SilvaDepartment of Cellular & Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1066-6100
Ghassan HamarnehSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-7448
Ivan R NabiDepartment of Cellular & Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0670-0513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of mitochondria-ER contacts (MERCs) from diffraction limited confocal images commonly uses fluorescence colocalization analysis of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as well as split fluorescent probes, such as the split-GFP-based contact site sensor (SPLICS). However, inter-organelle distances (∼10-60 nm) for MERCs are lower than the 200-250 nm diffraction limited resolution obtained by standard confocal microscopy. Super-resolution microscopy of 3D volume analysis provides a two-fold resolution improvement (∼120 nm XY; 250 nm Z), which remains unable to resolve MERCs. MCS-DETECT, a membrane contact site (MCS) detection algorithm faithfully detects elongated ribosome-studded riboMERCs when applied to 3D STED super-resolution image volumes. Here, we expressed the SPLICS

Indexed as

MCS-DETECTmitochondria-ER contact sitesSPLICSstimulated emission depletion microscopysuper-resolution microscopy

Identifiers

PMID40115170
PMCPMC11923443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.