ArticleJPRAS open2025
Registration of carpometacarpal arthroplasty in the Dutch arthroplasty register: Impacting factors and participation.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Carpal Implants in the Current Surgical Landscape: An Illustrated Overview.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of carpal- and carpometacarpal arthritis using arthroplasty is becoming more common in hand surgery. Trapeziectomy is regarded as the standard treatment. Complications of trapeziectomy like thumb shortening and reduced mobility may be less common in arthroplasty. However, arthroplasty may cause implant failure and possible revision surgery. The Dutch arthroplasty registry (LROI) has been registering hand and wrist implants since 2016. Data from the LROI from 2017 to 2022 was used aiming to assess descriptive data regarding carpal- and carpometacarpal arthroplasty to demonstrate associations between arthroplasty and possible risk factors. Furthermore, this study aims to demonstrate the potential of the LROI and assess registration completeness. The registry included 178 primary first carpometacarpal arthroplasties, along with 23 revision arthroplasties. About 69.1 % of primary surgeries was performed by plastic surgeons, the others by orthopedic surgeons. Primary surgery was performed in women in 74.2 % of cases. Revision arthroplasty was performed as often by plastic surgeons, as by orthopedic surgeons. Too few carpal implants were registered to assess these types of implants. Comparing the registrations in the LROI with the national healthcare claims database showed a completeness of 9.04 % for plastic surgeons, and 30.39 % for orthopedic surgeons. This low registration completeness did not allow for any definitive conclusions to be drawn. However, this study shows large-scale registries may provide useful insights, possibly guiding clinical decision-making. To improve registration completeness, efforts should be made to facilitate registration as quick as possible, while also boosting awareness among physicians that perform carpal- and carpometacarpal arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.