ArticleOTO open
Machine Learning Predicts 30-Day Readmission and Mortality After Surgical Resection of Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Healthcare Service Quality Metrics: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Externally Validated Machine Learning Models for 30-/90-/180-Day Unplanned Readmission After Head and Neck Cancer Hospitalizations in the United States.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning model to identify patients at high risk of 30-day mortality and hospital readmission using routinely collected health care data. Study Design: Prognostic predictive modeling and retrospective cohort study. The study was conducted in 2024 using data from 2006 to 2018, with at least a 30-day follow-up. Setting: The 2006 to 2018 National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: The study used deidentified NCDB data on 103,891 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients who underwent surgical resection. Machine learning models were trained on 80% of the data, tested on the remaining 20%, and evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to identify key predictors for 30-day mortality and readmission. Results: Among 103,891 patients, 5838 (5.6%) were readmitted, and 829 (0.8%) died within 30 days. The median age was 62, 69% male, and 89% white. Predictors included demographic and clinical data from the NCDB. Five machine learning models were combined and achieved an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83) for mortality prediction and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.65-0.68) for readmission prediction. SHAP analysis identified sex and urban-rural index as key predictors of mortality and readmission, respectively. Conclusion: Machine learning models can accurately predict mortality and readmission risks, offering insights into the most influential factors. With further validation, these models may enhance clinical decision-making in postsurgical care for HNSCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.