ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2025
Ultrasound imaging of congestion in heart failure: a narrative review.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Congestion in Heart Failure Using VExUS: Current Evidence, Limitations and Clinical Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lung Ultrasound Offers Fast and Reliable Exclusion of Heart Failure in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Diagnostic Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing Venous Congestion in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Review of Splanchnic, Cardiac and Pulmonary Ultrasound: Part 1: Conventional B-Mode, Colordoppler, and Vexus Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Congestion is a key determinant in the evolution of patients with heart failure (HF), leading to higher rates of emergency visits, hospital admissions and even mortality. Both clinical and subclinical congestion have been associated with a worse prognosis, hence the importance of its correct detection, characterization and treatment. Multiparametric assessment with ultrasound imaging, lung ultrasound (LUS) and venous Doppler analysis, has emerged as a very informative and accessible diagnostic tool in HF patients throughout their evolution. This review aims to provide a practical approach for the implementation of these techniques as well as a comprehensive summary of their prognostic and therapeutic applications in specific clinical settings. Methods: Relevant literature from 1997 to 2024 on congestion evaluation and management based on ultrasonographic findings was retrieved through PubMed research. Only English publications were included. Key Content and Findings: Ultrasound imaging for congestion detection and management is increasingly convening attention in HF scientific literature. Observational and randomized studies exhibit consistent and reproducible results where greater degrees of congestion have been strongly associated with worse clinical short- and long-term outcomes both in acute and chronic HF. On the other hand, ultrasound imaging helps adjusting diuretic therapy with more frequent and robust evidence regarding LUS than venous Doppler analysis. Conclusions: Despite exponential growing evidence supporting the use of ultrasound imaging in HF, LUS and venous Doppler analysis are not yet routine. Forthcoming evidence may help to consolidate these techniques in the management of HF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.