ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2025
Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a guideline recommended minimally invasive cardiovascular procedure used to replace severely stenosis aortic valves. Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and co-existing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a common defect affecting the left ventricle of the heart, have been excluded from TAVR studies due to perceived challenges to optimal valve implantation in this group of patients because of the hypertrophied left ventricle that can result in an abrupt drop in afterload from a newly replaced and more efficient aortic valve. This exclusion has resulted in paucity of data on this patient population. This study aims to review outcomes in patient with HCM undergoing TAVR for severe AS. Methods: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement, we performed a systematic literature search of published outcomes regarding TAVR in HCM patients to provide some insight in this patient population. Results: Our study showed that TAVR had significantly lower rates of in-hospital mortality, bleeding requiring a blood transfusion, invasive mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, vascular complications, and decreased length of stay (LOS) compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in our study population of 836 subjects from 11 publications. Our study is not a randomized controlled trial, which limits its generalization. Conclusions: In severe AS patients with HCM, TAVR results in better outcomes compared to surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.