ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Childbearing and Pregnancy Trends Among Female Plastic and Orthopedic/Trauma Surgeons in German-speaking Countries.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Female surgeons face challenges when trying to balance family planning and surgical duties. Although US surgeons have been thoroughly investigated in terms of obstetric complications and perception toward pregnancy, information on surgeons in German-speaking countries is lacking. Methods: A multicentric online survey was conducted to analyze female plastic and orthopedic/trauma surgeons from Germany, and plastic surgeons from Switzerland and Austria. Results: Mean age during first pregnancy was 33 years. More than one-third of all surgeons intentionally postponed pregnancy for professional reasons. About one-third of the German surgeons was banned from clinical work during pregnancy, whereas 6% of all Swiss/Austrian surgeons were banned. Accordingly, the Swiss/Austrian surgeons were operating more often during pregnancy. Obstetric complications ranged from 41% to 58%. The Swiss/Austrian plastic surgeons had the lowest complication rate. The rate of cervical insufficiency was approximately 4%, which was higher than in the general and US surgeons' population, whereas fertility issues and miscarriage were lower in German-speaking plastic surgeons. Conclusions: Despite national maternity protection laws, obstetric complication rates of surgeons in German-speaking countries and the United States were similar. Cervical insufficiency was even more prevalent in the study population, which could be associated with an older age of the expectants. Therefore, those (strict) laws need to be reconsidered because a ban from surgery can lead to intentional postponement of pregnancy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.