ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Investigation of Cranial Bone Changes Indicative of Increased Intracranial Pressure in Diverse Phenotypes of Craniosynostosis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cranial Bone Changes Associated With Intracranial Hypertension in Apert Syndrome: Insights for Early Surgical Intervention.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Despite the clinical importance of identifying increased intracranial pressure (IIP) in children with craniosynostosis (CS), its presence is often uncertain due to limited utilization of invasive measurement methods, inconclusive clinical evaluations, and its variability depending on the CS phenotype. Hence, prevalence reports are highly variable. We previously developed a computational method to identify pediatric chronic IIP of diverse etiology based on subtle cranial thickness and density anomalies quantified from computed tomography (CT) scans. In this study, we evaluate cranial signs of IIP in a large dataset of presurgical CT scans of patients with diverse phenotypes of CS and its prevalence. Methods: We quantified local cranial thickness and density in the CT scans of 417 patients with diverse phenotypes of CS (age 0-2 y). We used a normative reference of cranial development to quantify cranial bone anomalies in each phenotypic group and compared them with 48 patients with chronic IIP unrelated to CS. We then studied the risk of IIP and its prevalence in each phenotypic group of CS. Results: Patients with CS presented significant calvarial thickening and bone density decrease compared with normative patients ( Conclusions: Computational evaluation of routinely acquired presurgical CT scans can potentially support the evaluation of IIP in patients with CS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.