SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Perioperative versus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To report the latest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to compare perioperative versus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature retrieval via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane until April, 2024 for RCT which compared perioperative versus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer. Outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 5 RCTs including 2,735 patients were included for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a significant longer PFS in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.85; Conclusions: NAC can significantly prolong PFS in patients with resectable gastric cancer compared to AC, and the benefit is more significant in women and cN+ patients. Besides, our analysis indicated that NAC has a potential to improve OS compared with AC. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024546165.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.