ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Real-world comparison of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study of treatment outcomes.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolving role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Comparative Efficacy of PD-1 Inhibitor-Based Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Resectable Stage II-IIIa NSCLC: A Real-World Retrospective Study.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Precision and Efficiency of Pulmonary Tumor Detection With Robotic-AssistedThoracic cancer · 2025Article
- The efficacy and safety of tislelizumab in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pembrolizumab and tislelizumab have shown substantial clinical benefits in perioperative treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet no direct head-to-head trial has established which is optimal. This study, for the first time, aimed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC using real-world data. Methods: Data of patients with resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or tislelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by radical resection between December 2017 and August 2023 at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged 18 years and above, diagnosed with biopsy-proven and treatment-naïve clinical stage II-IIIb NSCLC were included in the study. Patients with autoimmune disease, pulmonary interstitial disease, acute infection, or systemic immunosuppression were excluded. Data that may affect treatment efficacy were collected, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, comorbidities, pulmonary function, pathological type, clinical stage, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS), dosage of neoadjuvant therapy, duration from final therapy to surgery and chemotherapy regimens, and compared between the two groups. The follow-up was performed through outpatient visits or telephone calls. The last follow-up was set in June 2024. Results: A total of 126 patients were included and divided into the pembrolizumab (n=62) and tislelizumab (n=64) groups with a median follow-up time of 26.3 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 59.76 years (standard deviation, 7.05 years) and 103 patients (81.75%) were current or former smoker. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (102, 80.95%) was the most common histological type, followed by adenocarcinoma (18, 14.29%), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (2, 1.59%) and sarcomatoid carcinoma (2, 1.59%). Although there was a lower proportion of SCC (72.58% Conclusions: This real-world evidence study supports the non-inferiority of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with resectable NSCLC. We believe that our findings could be an important reference for future studies comparing pembrolizumab- and tislelizumab-based treatment combinations in the neoadjuvant setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.