ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025
Upfront Definitive Oncoplastic Breast Conservation Surgery in Biopsy Missed Cancers: Our Experience.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
False negative rates of image-guided core needle biopsy of breast lesions, range from 0.1 to 2.5%, with most cases coming to light because of radio-pathological discordance. We are forced to consider upfront surgery for such lesions with unknown biology, which precludes us from utilizing preoperative systemic therapies and shared decision-making, to our advantage. We present a series of core biopsy missed breast neoplasms with radio-pathological discordance successfully managed with definitive upfront oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) without diagnostic delay, re-excisions, or compromising on oncological and cosmetic outcomes. This study retrospectively analyzed data from eight female patients assessed for breast-related concerns at our malignant disease treatment center between April 2021 and December 2023. These patients exhibited radio-pathological discordance during the triple assessment of BIRADS-4 breast lesions with two successive image-guided core needle biopsies (CNB) reported negative for DCIS/ invasive cancer. As patients had lump size < 5 cm and clinico-radiologically negative axilla (cN0), the pre-operative systemic staging was not warranted. These cases were discussed in a multi-disciplinary tumor board. Post-MDT consensus, they underwent upfront definitive oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with intra-operative frozen section analysis (FSA) to confirm the diagnosis and assess margins as well as the need for surgical axillary staging. Subsequent management followed a final histopathological examination, receptor subtype, and guideline-based staging. The mean age of the patients was 54.25 years, all presenting with palpable breast lumps. Primary tumors were mostly located in the upper outer and upper inner quadrants (3 cases each, 37.5%). Intraoperative frozen section analysis revealed invasive breast carcinoma in 5 cases (62.5%), papillary lesions with atypia in 2 (25%), and ductal carcinoma in situ in 1 (12.5%). Subsequent excision showed 4 (50%) invasive ductal carcinomas, 1 (12.5%) invasive lobular carcinoma, and 3 (37.5%) ductal carcinomas in situ. Level I oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) was performed in 5 cases, while level II OBCS was done in 3 cases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 5 cases with invasive carcinoma on frozen section. Median follow-up was 10.5 months (range: 3-24 months). Definitive upfront OBCS can be used as a one-stop surgical solution in select patients with missed cancers on biopsy. It can avoid diagnostic delays and reduce re-excision rates without having to compromise on oncological and cosmetic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.