ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025
Real-World Experience of Clinical Outcomes of Microscopic Margin Positivity After Radical Gastrectomy from a Tertiary Cancer Center in Northeast India.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- R1 Resection in Gastric Cancer: Marker of Tumor Biology Rather Than Surgical Failure.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Impact of Microscopic Resection Margin Positivity After Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical resection for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) remains the only potentially curative treatment, and the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy improves survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Margin-positive resection is a known poor prognostic factor. A retrospective observational study of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy of any type for GAC was done at a tertiary care cancer center in Northeast India. The study included patients who were operated on from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (5 years), and they were followed up to 31 March 2024. A total of 172 patients underwent gastrectomy of any type for GAC during the study period of which 13 patients were found to have microscopic positive (R1) histopathological margin (7.6%). The median age of the patients with positive margins was 48 years (range 27 to 69 years). The male-to-female ratio was 9:4. Ten patients (77%) had poorly differentiated or signet-ring cell carcinoma. The distal margin was the most frequent margin which was positive (84.6%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used in only 23.1% patients. At the end of our study period, only 1 patient out of 13 patients was alive. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 16.2 months (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 31.1 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 20.2 months (95% confidence interval 9.3 to 31.2 months). Patients who have microscopic positive margins after gastrectomy are found to have a high incidence of poorly differentiated or signet-ring cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.