ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025
Krukenberg Tumors: Does Surgical Resection Improve Survival?
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of Krukenberg tumors: Case report of an atypical presentation with obstructive renal failure.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Krukenberg tumors are ovarian malignant tumors characterized by mucin-secreting signet ring cells. They represent 30% of malignant ovarian neoplasms where the stomach, colorectal, and breast are the most common primary sites. The optimal treatment modality is still controversial whether systemic therapy or surgical resection. This is a retrospective cohort study where all patients diagnosed with Krukenberg tumors who presented to a tertiary cancer center from July 2015 to August 2021 were included. Demographic, preoperative, operative, postoperative, pathologic, and oncologic follow-up data were analyzed aiming to assess the overall and disease-free survival of this cohort of patients and the possible role of surgery. Eighty-four patients were enrolled. The mean age was 43.5 years. Colorectal cancer was the commonest primary site in 52.4% followed by gastric and breast cancer. In 69% of patients, the Krukenberg presented primarily, and in 64.3% both ovaries were affected. The median overall survival was 20 (14.1-25.9) months. In multivariate analysis, primary cancer in the breast, resection of both primary and Krukenberg, and R0 resection have better overall survival with hazard ratio (0.31, 2.5, and 0.09 respectively). The median disease-free survival (for those post R0 resection) was 32 (4.4-59.6) months, while peritoneal/omental concomitant metastasis was the only significant predictor of shorter DFS. In conclusion, cytoreductive surgery offers longer overall survival, especially if R0 resection can be achieved. In addition, the patients without peritoneo-omental spread will have a longer disease-free survival after successful R0 resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.