ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025
Status study of clinical application of ureteral access sheath in urology: a narrative review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Study of Factors Affecting Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.Cureus · 2026Article
- Handle with care: ureteral access sheath positioning modulates intrarenal pressure-insights from an EAU endourology ex vivo study using four ureteroscope sizes.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Research progress on treating urinary system stones using ureteroscopy combined With a negative-pressure suction sheath.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Does the use of a ureteral access sheath improve perioperative outcomes in ureteroscopy? A real-world multi-institutional study.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: As one of the effective minimally invasive methods for upper urinary tract stone treatment, ureteroscopic lithotripsy has gradually become the mainstream surgical approach. The routine use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS) during ureteroscopic lithotripsy has plenty of advantages. Although many concerns have emerged in the clinical practice of the UAS, the clinically improved devices have addressed these issues. This article reviews the advantages, existing issues, and current improvements of UAS in clinical practice, aiming to provide references for better clinical application and further improvements of UAS. Methods: We searched in PubMed database using the terms: "ureteral access sheath", "ureteroscopic lithotripsy" or "flexible ureteroscope". Articles were independently evaluated for inclusion based on predetermined criteria. Key Content and Findings: The routine use of UAS during ureteroscopic lithotripsy facilitates the entry and exit of the ureteroscope, improves intraoperative visibility, and reduces postoperative complications. However, concerns over ureteral wall injury, difficulty in controlling renal pelvic pressure, lack of reduction in operation time, failure to increase stone free rates, and controversies regarding the ratios of endoscope-sheath diameter have limited the clinical application of UAS. The emergence of clinically improved devices such as intelligent pressure controlled, tip bendable, and rigid ureteroscope aided UAS has addressed these issues, laying a foundation for their further clinical application. Conclusions: The clinical improvement of the UAS can serve as a bridge for the widespread usage of the ureteroscopic lithotripsy. In the future, we anticipate more innovative advancements in UAS, making their clinical use even more practical and convenient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.