Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114808›Full record

ReviewPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2024

Reuse, Repurpose, and Recycle: Bacteriophages and Microbial Surveillance (1921-2023).

Claas Kirchhelle, Miriam F Lipton, Tristan M Nolan, Wim G Meijer, Senjuti Saha, Neeraja Sankaran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claas KirchhelleSchool of History, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Miriam F LiptonScience History Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tristan M NolanSchool of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Wim G MeijerSchool of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Senjuti SahaChild Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Neeraja SankaranNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the historically most important yet overlooked forms of harnessing bacteriophages has been their use as bacterial diagnostics and as tools to type microbial environments. This article reconstructs the origins, global rise, and constant repurposing of bacteriophages for microbial surveillance. It shows the importance of phage-typing infrastructures for international networks of microbial exchange, which often favored the interests of high-income countries. It also analyzes phages' use as phenotypic diagnostics and their post-1980 repurposing within molecular and genomic platforms as well as phages' current revival as environmental surveillance tools in high- and low-income contexts. By connecting the phenotypic past and genomic present of phage diagnosis and typing, our analysis highlights the importance of bacteriophage reuse and technological recycling in driving innovation across basic and applied biomedical research. These findings challenge narrow molecular concepts of innovation and underline the need to pay critical attention to power asymmetries within existing microbial infrastructures.

Indexed as

innovationmicrobial infrastructuresmicrobial surveillancephage diagnosticsphage-typingtechnological recycling

Identifiers

PMID40114808
PMCPMC11920703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.