Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114805›Full record

ReviewPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2024

Addressing the Research and Development Gaps in Modern Phage Therapy.

Paul E Turner, Joana Azeredo, Ed T Buurman, Sabrina Green, Jakob Krause Haaber, Douglas Haggstrom, Koichi Kameda de Figueiredo Carvalho, Claas Kirchhelle, Mercedes Gonzalez Moreno, Jean-Paul Pirnay and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2024
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paul E TurnerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Joana AzeredoCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Ed T BuurmanCARB-X, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sabrina GreenLaboratory of Gene Technology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3959-2640
Jakob Krause HaaberSNIPR Biome ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Douglas HaggstromINCubator for Antibiotic Therapies Europe (INCATE), Basel, Switzerland.
Koichi Kameda de Figueiredo CarvalhoCentre Emile Durkheim, University of Bordeaux, Talence, France.
Claas KirchhelleSchool of History, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mercedes Gonzalez MorenoINCubator for Antibiotic Therapies Europe (INCATE), Basel, Switzerland.
Jean-Paul PirnayLaboratory for Molecular and Cellular Technology, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Mirza Alas PortilloSchool of History, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is on the rise globally, prompting increased research and development (R&D) of phage therapy as a strategy to address difficult-to-treat bacterial infections. We review the current state of phage therapy research, including major operational, epistemic, and biological challenges for phage R&D, and discuss some new approaches to developing the technology motivated by recent breakthroughs such as artificial intelligence and synthetic phage production. In addition, we contextualize these R&D challenges and opportunities in light of the ongoing predicament of commercial antimicrobial innovation and current public-private efforts to reinvigorate the pipeline of antimicrobial drug discovery. We conclude with reflections on the potential for new phage therapies to be readily accessible across all income contexts to better ensure broad patient access, and consider possible alternatives to current public and public-private solutions for phage therapy and production.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebiofilmbiotechnologypatient accesspersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID40114805
PMCPMC11920706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.