Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114760›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2025

Can social media encourage young Polish adults to visit a dermatologist? An original study.

Zuzanna Pawlus, Aleksandra Spyra, Karina Polak, Bartosz Miziołek, Beata Bergler-Czop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zuzanna PawlusStudents' Scientific Association at the Chair and Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Aleksandra SpyraStudents' Scientific Association at the Chair and Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Karina PolakDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Bartosz MiziołekDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Beata Bergler-CzopDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social media (SM) play an important role in contemporary world, influencing all areas of life, including dermatology, as people are often obtaining medical knowledge from content-sharing platforms on the Internet. Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate if Polish adults aged 18-35 follow dermatological news on SM, which platforms and contents they find the most interesting and to assess if SM content can encourage them to visit a healthcare professional. Material and methods: Online questionnaires were distributed from January to March 2024 among young adult people from Poland. The collected data were analysed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: 44% of respondents confirmed that SM content prompted them to visit a dermatologist. The most popular platform was Instagram. The main reason for visiting a specialist was the desire to improve the appearance of one's skin. In 34% of the cases, the dermatological examination revealed skin disease. According to 92% of respondents, SM can have a positive impact on the willingness to visit a dermatologist. Conclusions: 81% of young Polish adults read dermatology-related content on SM. The main areas of interest were skincare and skin diseases. Almost half of the respondents were encouraged by SM to visit a dermatologist, with 56% consistency of diagnosis made by a healthcare professional and SM user.

Indexed as

dermatologistdermatologyPolish adultssocial media

Identifiers

PMID40114760
PMCPMC11921916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.