ArticleOncology letters2025
Prognostic value of the neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between immune-inflammatory index and osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Association between systemic inflammatory response index and the prognosis of patients with localized and advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- An increase in splenic volume after first-line immunotherapy is associated with worse PFS in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Meet-URO Score in a Real-World Cohort of mRCC Patients Treated with First-Line TKIs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- CSF2 polarized neutrophils and invaded renal cancer cellsOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) not only indicates the inflammatory response within the tumor microenvironment but may also correlate with tumor biological behavior (such as aggressiveness). The present study aimed to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis on the impact of the NLR on the prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To this aim, a comprehensive search of multiple relevant databases, including PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify literature related to NLR and RCC prognosis. Following rigorous literature screening and quality assessment, a systematic quantitative analysis was ultimately performed on several studies that met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated a significant association between elevated NLR levels and poor prognosis in patients with RCC, suggesting that high NLR levels may serve as an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes. Therefore, the present study provides important evidence for clinical decision-making, further demonstrating that NLR can serve as an independent prognostic indicator for patients with RCC, aiding healthcare professionals in making more precise judgments in patient management and treatment strategy formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.